Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer spoke at a Harvard Law School symposium, criticizing the reversal of Roe v. Wade as a decision driven by personal beliefs rather than consideration of the law's broader context.
The reversal of Roe v. Wade is an example of a decision driven by judges' personal beliefs rather than consideration of the law's broader context.
Breyer compared different methods of legal interpretation during the discussion, which was part of a conference on judicial review.
The conference was jointly hosted by the Harvard Law Review and Texas A&M University Center on the Structural Constitution.
Justice Stephen Breyer criticizes Roe v. Wade reversal at HLS symposium.