The Dismissal Deniers
Sir John Kerr’s Decision and Legacy
Next Tuesday marks fifty years since Governor-General Sir John Kerr exercised his constitutional authority to resolve a severe political stalemate and ensure the government could access properly approved funds necessary for its function.
For taking this step, Sir John has faced relentless criticism during his life and even after his death. It must be understood, however, that he did not remove a failed government himself—Australians later did that through democratic means. Kerr merely created the opportunity, and this outcome was a consequence, not his goal.
Commemorations and Renewed Debate
This anniversary brings an expected resurgence of discourse about Kerr’s actions. Yet few anticipated the breadth of this year’s criticism, which takes the shape of three coordinated efforts: a new biography of Gough Whitlam, a documentary from Sky News Australia, and a full-day program hosted by the Museum of Australian Democracy, broadcast from Old Parliament House.
“The latter, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, will include such partisan players as journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston and academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all fierce Kerr antagonists.”
As many participants have Labor Party connections, the event promises a vigorous and partial debate—one likely to stir considerable controversy across Canberra’s parliamentary district on what would otherwise be a solemn and reflective day.
Author’s Summary
Half a century since the Dismissal, Sir John Kerr’s momentous choice remains the focus of contested legacy, reigniting old divisions within Australia’s political memory.