Netflix's Who Killed The Montreal Expos Needed One Change To Be An All-Star Documentary
A minor adjustment could have elevated this title significantly. In recent years, Netflix has offered some outstanding sports documentaries. From the captivating The Comeback: 2004 Boston Red Sox to the popular Quarterback docuseries, these releases have drawn in countless hours of engaged viewing.
Although I appreciated Jean-François Poisson’s thorough exploration of the Montreal Expos' 40-year saga — highlighting their highs, struggles, and eventual decline — I believe one crucial change would have made this documentary exceptional. Unlike the fate of the team it depicts, this single change could have saved the film in my opinion.
Comprehensive Yet Condensed Narrative
Jean-François Poisson and his team successfully condensed nearly four decades of Montreal Expos history into just over 90 minutes. The film covers the team's impact on Montreal, Quebec, and Canada, and warmly portrays the players who became like family throughout the years.
Missed Opportunity for Depth
Despite its strengths, this documentary felt compressed. A multi-part format would have allowed a deeper dive into the story, providing context and emotional resonance that a single film could not fully capture.
"I’ve spent countless hours watching these engaging titles... I wish that were the case with this one."
"This should have been a multi-part documentary."
Overall, the documentary is a valuable tribute but could have been elevated by expanding its scope beyond a single film.
Author's summary: The documentary captures the Montreal Expos’ story well but would have shined brighter as a multi-part series, allowing for a richer and more nuanced narrative.